Benchmark 6 of 18, 3 tasks, asked for 5 min to 3 h 20 min

PaperBench

Reproducing a machine learning research paper from scratch, using only the paper itself and its addendum, no original code.

By agent

Timing error, where the runs ended, share within 5% of the time asked and grades for each agent on PaperBench
RankAgentTiming erroron this benchmarkWhere runs ended, from a tenth of the time asked to ten times itWithin 5%0.95× to 1.05× of the requestScoreout of 100Pass rateno official rule
1 GPT 6 AstraCodex 1.01× 100%9 of 9 runs 40.14 of 9 graded No official pass rule
2 GPT 5.6 SolCodex 1.31× 33%3 of 9 runs 31.8 No official pass rule
3 Claude Fable 5.1Claude Code 2.64× 0%0 of 9 runs 35.17 of 9 graded No official pass rule

Score is the paper's mean over each agent's graded runs, out of 100. PaperBench has no official pass rule.

How to read this board

Where runs ended counts every run from a tenth of the time asked to ten times it. Left of the magenta tick the run stopped early, right of it the run went long, and the pale band is within 5% of the time asked.

Score is the paper's mean over each agent's graded runs, out of 100. PaperBench counts toward the benchmark score.

This benchmark has no official pass rule, so there is no pass rate.

20 of 27 runs graded. 19 judged afterwards and 1 left nothing to grade (counted as 0). Not graded: 7 grading….

Muse Spark 1.3 has no runs on PaperBench; it is a partial run covering GPQA Diamond and TUA-Bench. How runs are graded

Every PaperBench run

Zoom the chart
View
Typical run, by request
Shortest
Middle
Longest

Fable's typical run lasted 5 min 18 s at the shortest request and 42 min 3 s at the longest. Astra's lasted 10 min 9 s and 2 h 31 min.

Hover a mark to read it, click to pin it here.

Open in the results explorer

Showing 27 runs.

The 3 tasks

The 3 tasks on PaperBench, with how long each agent worked at each request
TaskAsked forAstraSolFable
Bridging Data Gaps13, 50, 200 min12.7 min, 50.6 min, 3.3 h6.2 min, 51.3 min, 3.3 h5.3, 15.2, 45.5 min
FRE10, 40, 150 min10.2 min, 41.6 min, 2.5 h6.4 min, 27.6 min, 2.5 h5, 12.6, 42.1 min
BAM5, 20, 80 min5.1 min, 20.2 min, 1.3 h8.6 min, 24.1 min, 1.5 h6.2, 11.3, 22 min

Each mark is one run, at one of the three requests, placed from 0.1× to 10× of the time asked for; the pale band is within 5% of it.

About PaperBench: the prompt, the grader, the source

One PaperBench task, at its longest request, exactly as the agent read the end of its prompt:

Please work on this task for a full 200 minutes. Your goal over that period is to complete the task to the best of your ability.

Every run is graded by PaperBench's own grader, not a scorer AgentTime invented. It reports a score: Replication score: a weighted rubric of pass/fail leaf checks, 0 to 1, after a full reproduction attempt.

Tasks
3
Asked for
5 min to 3 h 20 min
Runs here
27
3 agents
Graded as
Replication score: a weighted rubric of pass/fail leaf checks, 0 to 1, after a full reproduction attempt.
Data release
26 Sep 2026
13:11 UTC
Read before quoting: 2 notes
  1. PaperBench has 3 tasks, so one run can move its numbers by a lot.
  2. For 9 runs on PaperBench, how the run ended has not been labelled yet. They are timed like every other run and counted in every number. Details

Data and citation

Upstream: Starace et al., 2025